RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Michigan State Funded Amtrak Trains In Danger Of Being Cut » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
BNSF 1088
Member # 2400
 - posted
The Rally will be in East Lansing on Fri April 9th 1pm we will be answering qs and handing out infomation on all the crazy house bills that will kill Amtrak in Michigan.M-DOT also said it will take 5yrs for ridership to go up on the Blue Water so we will have less ridership for the next 5yrs were in real danger of the Pere Marquette & Blue Water trains ending on Sept 30 2004 if we don't act on all these Reps and Sen that wan't to get rid of funding for Amtrak.

------------------
LOOK LISTEN LIVE
BEFORE CROSSING RR TRACKS

[This message has been edited by BNSF 1088 (edited 04-05-2004).]
 

BNSF 1088
Member # 2400
 - posted
House can't get enough support for budget cuts
March 31, 2004, 12:25 AM


Rep. Leon Drolet, a Republican from Macomb County's Clinton Township, proposed a number of spending cuts Tuesday, including one to eliminate the state's $7.1 million subsidy for Amtrak's passenger lines in Michigan. It failed to win enough support to change the transportation budget.

On the Net:

Michigan Legislature: http://www.michiganlegislature

------------------
LOOK LISTEN LIVE
BEFORE CROSSING RR TRACKS
 

BNSF 1088
Member # 2400
 - posted
To NARP Members in Michigan, March 31, 2004--

At the behest of bus company Indian Trails, Inc., State Sen. Shirley Johnson (R-Royal Oak), who chairs the appropriations committee, is today introducing a provision which would prohibit Amtrak from ever charging a fare below what is charged by any private entity participating in the state's bus loan program.

While many fares Amtrak charges are more expensive than bus fares, this provision would limit Amtrak's ability to set fares, particularly in regards to special discounts (such as those for seniors, children and NARP members). Amtrak believes the provision would reduce its ridership and revenues and thus increase what the State of Michigan must pay Amtrak for the train. This amendment also could give legislators elsewhere bad ideas about micromanaging Amtrak.

"Any state subsidy for rail passenger service between Port Huron and Chicago shall not be used to artifically reduce passenger fares by a private entity participating in the Intercity Bus Loan Program." Indian Trails does not serve Durand, Lapeer or Port Huron. It does serve Battle Creek and Kalamazoo, so this amendment also raises the possibility that Amtrak might have to charge different fares on the "Blue Water" and on the Detroit trains in markets common to both routes.

Please contact your state legislator immediately and urge them to work against any such provision. We understand that, if this provision gets anywhere, Senator Mark Schauer (D-Battle Creek) will introduce language to strike it. To learn who your state senator is, and for contact information, go to http://www.michigan.gov/ .


--Ross B. Capon,
NARP Executive Director

------------------
LOOK LISTEN LIVE
BEFORE CROSSING RR TRACKS
 

MOKSRail
Member # 3163
 - posted
While state investment in intrastate services is laudible, the experience in Michigan, Missouri and Oregon demonstrates the futility of basing any Amtrak "reform" plan on requiring states to pick-up the long-distance service costs.
-Doug

------------------

 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us