RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » 'Cardinal' Route Under Threat » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
notelvis
Member # 3071
 - posted
An article in the May 5th Richmond (VA) Times-Dispatch reports that CSX plans to lease 200 miles of track to the shortline Buckingham Branch Railroad.

The 200 miles in question include the 'Cardinal' route from Orange, VA to Clifton Forge, VA via Charlottesville and Staunton. The new operator would be responsible for maintenance and it is uncertain whether they will be able to keep the line up to passenger train standards.

Wonder what impact this will have on the 'Cardinal'?

------------------
David Pressley
 

CG96
Member # 1408
 - posted
Well, seeing as how Senator Robert Byrd has written it tinot the US Cade that there be Washington - Chicago Service via WV, the train will still run (persuant to a repael of said law) no matter how bad the track will get. Perhaps this law could be used to force the new landlord (or at least the currant one) to maintain the track at a presentable and decent standard (at least Class 3, preferably Class 4 or higher).
 
Gilbert B Norman
Member # 1541
 - posted
As I noted over at another board, this could well be someone's idea of "21st Century Union Busting".

It was "groundbreaking" enough wehn Amtrak employed Train and Engine crews commenced running over roads on which they did not hold seniority, albeit they did hold seniority within an Amtrak crew district that could well involve operation over several roads' pre-existing seniority districts.

Watch out, Amtrak crews may well refuse to "cross', or at least not until some specific ruling (either judicial, but hopefully collective bargaining) is pronounced regarding the matter.
 

notelvis
Member # 3071
 - posted
Speculation on the Carolina Association for Passenger Trains email list is that the Cardinal might be rerouted on NS via Lynchburg and Roanoke back to the current route at Keyser, WV.

This would by-pass all current station stops from Staunton, VA to Huntington, WV.

Once, 10-15 years ago, Amtrak ran a test train to look at a re-route vis NS to Lynchburg and then on the CSX James River Line back to the current route at Clifton Forge. This possibility would miss only the existing station stop at Staunton BUT would take a couple of hours (or so) longer due mostly to an awkward and time-consuming backup move in Lynchburg. The interchange track there between NS and CSX is in the 'wrong' quadrant.

------------------
David Pressley

[This message has been edited by notelvis (edited 05-07-2004).]
 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us