This is topic Amtrak Announces Strategic Reform Initiatives, Requests $1.8 Billion for FY 2006 in forum Amtrak at RAILforum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.railforum.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi/topic/11/3029.html

Posted by rY (Member # 3528) on :
 
quote:
News Release
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
60 Massachusetts Avenue NE
Washington, DC 20002
www.amtrak.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Media Relations 202-906-3860
ATK-05-039

April 21, 2005

Amtrak Announces Strategic Reform Initiatives, Requests $1.8 Billion for FY 2006

Railroad pursuing legislation to improve service & competition
WASHINGTON - Amtrak Chairman David Laney and President and CEO David L. Gunn today announced a series of bold and comprehensive strategic reform initiatives the railroad is undertaking as corporate actions and pursuing in legislation to revitalize U.S. passenger rail service. Additionally, the railroad will seek $1.82 billion in federal funding to support critical FY '06 capital investment programs and to support national operations.

The initiatives seek to transform the funding and development of passenger rail service, and introduce competition, efficiency and cost-savings. "These are dynamic measures to strengthen passenger rail service at a time when our nation needs it most," said Laney. Together, they advance four fundamental objectives:
"Business as Usual Cannot Continue"

"Despite the record number of passengers being served by the railroad today, Amtrak cannot continue business as usual, nor can the snail pace of passenger rail development continue to lag behind the growing need in high-demand regions of the country," said Laney. "These initiatives will both continue fundamental reform at Amtrak and help spur a rational and much-needed growth of the passenger rail network. It is Amtrak's belief that the leadership of such development is the role of states and the federal government - not Amtrak. Instead, Amtrak must in the long run transform itself to a competitive provider of passenger rail services, with the recognition that in the near term it will remain the steward of the national passenger rail system as it is today."

Amtrak Reforms

In 2002, Amtrak eliminated its unwieldy business-unit structure and began a series of other reforms: reduction of management layers, zero-based budgeting, strict GAAP accounting and other cost controls, including the reduction and elimination of several routes. Amtrak also returned its focus to the railroad's core business of passenger service and asset rebuilding. More than 5,000 positions were eliminated and the growth in operating costs was brought under control.

Building on these efforts, Amtrak will for FY '06 align financial accounting, planning and management accountability along five business lines to facilitate future decision-making. The five business lines are: Amtrak-owned infrastructure management (principally the Northeast Corridor (NEC)); NEC operations; state corridor operations; national long-distance operations and ancillary businesses. These lines are not a return to the business unit structure and do not separate NEC operations and capital project management. Amtrak has reviewed various proposals to separate the management of NEC operations and infrastructure, but concluded that complexities and risks of separation outweigh the benefits, and therefore that such a separation is not advisable at this time.

With an ultimate goal of a vibrant passenger rail system with multiple service options and a competitive supply industry, Amtrak will undertake a wide range of reforms, including the clarification of individual business activity costs, increased outsourcing, and the initial facilitation of competition for selected routes and functions.

Public Sector and Legislative Reforms

While internal reforms at Amtrak will help provide a foundation for a competitive and efficient national passenger rail system, strong federal and state leadership is essential if passenger rail is to meet the demand for service. Among the legislative changes called for to accomplish the reform objectives are:
Federal Funding for Fiscal Year 2006

As Amtrak will undertake the internal reforms addressed earlier and pursue public sector and legislative reforms, little reduction in the need for federal support will be realized in FY '06. In fact, funding for operations, critical assets such as the Northeast Corridor and other needs are essential to the success of the reform initiatives Amtrak has outlined

Consequently, Amtrak is seeking federal funding in FY '06 of $1.82 billion. This request includes $787 million for capital infrastructure projects, $560 million to support train operations, $278 million for service on existing debt, $175 million in working capital and $20 million for transition costs associated with the reforms previously outlined.

Current federal Amtrak funding (FY '05) is $1.2 billion. However, Amtrak cautioned that an appropriation at this level would be insufficient in FY '06 to sustain operations and the backlog of capital projects the railroad is working to erase. Amtrak's Board and management want to emphasize that Amtrak cannot continue to operate at the current funding level of $1.2 billion in FY06.

Amtrak Hearing Scheduled for April 21

Today, April 21, 2005 Amtrak Chairman Laney along with President and CEO David Gunn are testifying at an Amtrak oversight hearing before the Senate Subcommittee on Surface Transportation and Merchant Marine.

The publication, "Amtrak Strategic Reform Initiatives," is available in the Government Affairs section of the Web site.


 
Posted by Mr. Toy (Member # 311) on :
 
I saw this yesterday. Overall it seems to have some superficial similarities with the Bush plan, but is more realistic in its approach.

This one line, however, stood out to me.
quote:
Establishment of phased-in financial performance thresholds for Amtrak's existing 15 long-distance trains and any future similar proposed service. Amtrak is initiating a series of actions to improve the financial performance of these trains. Services falling below the thresholds could be continued through support by states or other authorities, reconfigured or eliminated.
The question left unanswered is what will be the basis for this "threshold". Performance standards are a good thing if they are realistic. But will they be set impossibly high so that no train can meet them?

On the plus side, it leaves open the possibility of adding long distance routes.
 


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2