This is topic Blue Line Train Crash in forum Amtrak at RAILforum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.railforum.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi/topic/11/7817.html

Posted by yukon11 (Member # 2997) on :
 
Didn't another incident, with a Blue Line train, happen sometime last year? Can't recall.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-preliminary-report-released-on-ohare-cta-crash-20140407,0,613865.story

The train operator "dozed off"! Maybe an extra cup of Starbucks would prevent this.

Richard
 
Posted by Geoff Mayo (Member # 153) on :
 
60 hours in one week for a safety-critical job? Though I don't think there is a magical maximum number of hours per week, there are fatigue models - and even without knowing the specifics, it is still hard to imagine a scenario where that number of hours is within tolerances, especially with a shift from daytime to nighttime hours in that timeframe.

I recall another incident where a Blue Line car/train rolled away. Is this the one you mean?
 
Posted by Railroad Bob (Member # 3508) on :
 
Most of these kinds of rail jobs have odd hours and even with the Hours of Service laws (not sure how they govern the "El" workers) it's pretty easy to get your sleep cycles messed up.

Still no excuse; I'd like to think "job responsibility" would keep the operators awake, but still these incidents continue to happen.
She'll be drug tested, of course. Maybe lawsuits will fly; they usually do. I feel bad for the injured passengers. That video of the train "climbing the escalator" is very dramatic! Shades of the movie Silver Streak; even happened in the same city.
 
Posted by yukon11 (Member # 2997) on :
 
Geoff - Yes, your link to the runaway train at Forest Park was the incident I was thinking of.

Are Blue Line workers unionized? I would think shorter working shifts, to prevent fatigue, would be considered a much needed bargaining point. I think Amtrak employees have gained the ability for more reasonable shifts. Even so, you have to wonder if "dozing off" is the full explanation.

Richard
 
Posted by Geoff Mayo (Member # 153) on :
 
Strangely enough (I speak sarcastically) the CTA has now reviewed its procedures regarding shift patterns, and limited new hires to so many hours per week. But they not admitting liability. Something smells.

An overspeed sensor of some sort which should have limited overruns was incorrectly located as well.
 
Posted by Ocala Mike (Member # 4657) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Geoff Mayo:


the CTA has now reviewed its procedures regarding shift patterns, and limited new hires to so many hours per week.


I would think that closing the barn door after the horse gets out is prima facie evidence that the door was, in fact, open in the first place.

Hope the CTA has deep pockets.
 


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2