This is topic When Amtrak Resumes Services in forum Amtrak at RAILforum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.railforum.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi/topic/11/8580.html

Posted by yukon11 (Member # 2997) on :
 
https://is.gd/kKif2n

Ticket sales limited to 50% of train capacity. A 20% cut in workforce by Oct. Face masks required for passengers in waiting rooms and on the train. The closure of cafe cars with food takeout required.

I have a problem with the face mask rule. I think, especially with time and if the virus level drops significantly, one could question how effective the masks are. I sure wouldn't wish to wear a mask in coach. I assume masks won't be required in a sleeper. With takeout food only, could it mean more food truck service or even a separate takeout food car as part of the train?

Will all Amtrak routes and frequencies return to normal?

Richard
 
Posted by Gilbert B Norman (Member # 1541) on :
 
Don't know if there are more "butts on the cushions", but the consists are growing.

Observed:

#4(2) 2 P-42, Sleeper, Sleeper, Diner, Lounge, Coach, Coach, Coach-Bagg---7 cars

#5(4) 2 P-42, Bagg, Dorm, Sleeper, Diner, Lounge, Coach, Coach, Coach----8 cars

But for me, you're not about to catch this 78yo on a train, plane, bus, using a public restroom, attending a public event, or staying in a hotel "until further notice".
 
Posted by PullmanCo (Member # 1138) on :
 
Amtrak should use sleepers not sold as coaches for the moment. Remove the curtains, mattresses, beds, pillows and towels. Assign 1 person (unless a couple) to each section, and 2 people to each compartment. We are all old enough to understand those terms.

Seal the shower annexes.

You just added 37 seats per car.
 
Posted by Gilbert B Norman (Member # 1541) on :
 
While this material only has tangential bearing to commercial transportation, it is nevertheless interesting, in view of that the population is comprised of epidemiologists; e.g. Drs. Birx and Fauci:

New York Times

Fair Use:

 
Posted by Gilbert B Norman (Member # 1541) on :
 
Anyone think Amtrak travel has sunk to a new low?

Well, try on United FRA-IAD for size.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/09/business/flying-coronovirus.html?smid=em-share
 
Posted by George Harris (Member # 2077) on :
 
For low travel volume: Recently my oldest son drove from Dallas to Memphis and flew back. Pre Corona American had 5 flights per day MEM-DFW. The schedule a month ago when he did this was 2 per day. His flight had 17 passengers. But the true ghost town feel was the terminal itself. Like a late 60's railroad station crowd. 5 cars pulled up in front of the terminal, normal probably 30 plus. One car passed me while stopped. Looked inside, one American counter open and about 2 people in front of it.
 
Posted by yukon11 (Member # 2997) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gilbert B Norman:
Anyone think Amtrak travel has sunk to a new low?

Well, try on United FRA-IAD for size.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/09/business/flying-coronovirus.html?smid=em-share

******************************

How can Lufthansa withstand a 2.4 billion quarterly loss and survive? If all the major airlines are in such horrendous financial shape, will any of them survive?

Maybe we will all be back to taking passenger trains once again.

Richard
 
Posted by Gilbert B Norman (Member # 1541) on :
 
Richard, "before it's over", I believe at least one, and likely more, US flagged airlines will petition for Bankruptcy Protection. American's acquisition of US Air, and for that matter the latter's immediately prior acquisition of America West, resulted in issuance of debt instruments. That means leverage which sure can juice up returns (ROI) when "everything's rosy"....nevermind the result when "things are otherwise". "Otherwise" results in some mighty creative assets to pledge as collateral to stay afloat.

"Irrational exuberance" and airlines go hand in hand.
But however the airline industry emerges "on the other side", there may be an impetus to develop potential Corridors, but I would not expect any like impetus regarding Long Distance routes.
 
Posted by Gilbert B Norman (Member # 1541) on :
 
I'm sure the advocacy community cheers when they learn of this Huffington Post material.

Fair Use:
Even if not said, the freelance journalist author, obviously holds "make 'em run more trains". But to do so will require dedicated passenger ROW's much as exists in the Corridor and with Utah Transit. But so far as imposing upon the industry to run more passenger trains over their existing property simply represents a "taking". As more roads adopt "The Gospel According to Saint Hunter", otherwise known as Precision Railroading, the impact of any such "taking" will be harder to absorb.

"One a day", even if they wish it could be gone, but over the past fifty years, the industry has become Kubler-Ross Phase V "Acceptance" on such. Any more intrusions, uh "not too sure" on that one.
 


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2