Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
RAILforum
»
Passenger Trains
»
Amtrak
»
Look what the "Amtrak option" means these days
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ira Slotkin: [QB] Companion bathers not withstanding JetBlue's market is expanding, But not their room for knees and feet. For that, Amtrak can't be beat. This suggestion is not needed (Unsought advice oft goes unheeded): To avoid the man-o-war be like Hank And keep your a s s out of the tank. And I add with all due deference Rather than by in- or reference: Some times I have a deeper sense That some one is on reefer-ence Not me. Not for a loonnngg time. Meanwhile: now that we are on this TRAIN of thought: What is the plural of man-o-war? Men-o-war? Man-o-wars? Draftees? Not a school of fish but perhaps a boot camp? And what about the females? Are they also man-o-war fish? And that somehow takes us back to the same *** companion issues of whence we began. ps - Henry - thanks for not protesting when I call you Hank. Much easier to rhyme. Rambling off the main line. Ira [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
Home Page
Powered by
Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2
Copyright © 2007-2016
TrainWeb, Inc.
Top of Page
|
TrainWeb
|
About Us
|
Advertise With Us
|
Contact Us