RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Flag Protection » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
yukon11
Member # 2997
 - posted
Just curious.....in the old days, whenever a train made an unscheduled stop with the danger of being overtaken by another train, there were procedures required to signal an approaching train. Under the old "rule 99", a flagman might have to place 2 torpedoes (explosive noisemakers which detonated under approaching wheels) and, when necessary, signal via a lighted fuse or red flag, to warn the oncoming train.

How do Amtrak and freight railroads do it today? Is it all by radio communication, or is some sort of flagging/lighted fuse signal also necessary?

Richard
 
Henry Kisor
Member # 4776
 - posted
Hey, this is a good question -- isn't there someone with operations knowledge here who can answer it?
 
rresor
Member # 128
 - posted
No more flagging, and no more torpedoes. Torpedoes passed out of general use when cabooses were discontinued a decade or more ago. Flagging was obviated by the move to radio-issued "track warrants" or "direct traffic control". Both work much the same way. The dispatcher grants exclusive occupancy of defined limits to a train (in DTC, the blocks have set boundaries, in TWC the segment is defined by mileposts). TWC does allow for following movements in the same block, but with an instruction to "look out for Train #__", with a requirement to proceed at restricted speed.

Work limits for track gangs are granted in essentially the same way. They can either be an absolute block, or have a provision that trains can contact the foreman in charge and request permission through the limits.

I'm sure anybody who is a dispatcher can amplify this and correct any misstatements I might have made. I know this stuff only from having observed it during cab rides, hi-railing, and working on the track.
 
Geoff M
Member # 153
 - posted
Only other thing I can add is that if the train is delayed in section for a time, it should approach the next signal at reduced speed (prepared to stop?) until the aspect can be determined.

I can't find specific references to this rule so it may not apply nationally or may indeed be partially or wholy wrong.

Geoff M.
 
rresor
Member # 128
 - posted
Geoff M.: That's the "delay in block" rule promulgated by FRA after the collision of a MARC train with Amtrak's "Capitol Ltd" in Maryland.

Rule says that, if a train comes to a stop for any reason between block signals, it must proceed at restricted speed until the aspect of the next block signal can be observed.

That's really independent of any flagging rule, though.
 
Geoff M
Member # 153
 - posted
Thanks for that rresor; my reply was triggered by yukon11's "made an unscheduled stop" comment.

Geoff M.
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us