RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » A Different Take » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
yukon11
Member # 2997
 - posted
An interestering article from the "United Rail Passenger Alliance", from back in 2005:

http://www.unitedrail.org/2005/09/03/concepts-of-the-successful-long-distance-train-of-the-future/

I don't know if we will ever see the changes they suggest. I can't quite buy their premise that Amtrak could be an umbrella company with the passenger train routes run by private corporations. The look to several cruise ship enterprises which are run by private companies such as Marriott and Hilton. I think the problem, in this case, is that cruise ships and passenger trains are two different kettles of fish.

Aside from Marriott and Hilton, possibly there is some potential for having a few Amtrak LD routes run by private operational franchises. I do agree that a private group to establish high-end rail excursions, like the Rocky Mountaineer, in this country would be successful. Of course, getting an agreement by the freight railroads would be a hurdle.

They make an interesting point that Amtrak, unlike other travel modes, does not require passengers to "open up their wallets" on board for additional services, save a trip to a lounge car or snack car.

They point out demographic differences between sleeping passengers and coach passengers on long distance trains. Also, differences between passengers on short-distance trains and long distance trains. The idea of premium coach, standard coach, and short-distance coach options is interesting.

I like the idea of a bedroom-roomette or bedroom-lounge car, as well as a prepaid continental breakfast available to all.

Richard
 
Geoff Mayo
Member # 153
 - posted
The idea of Marriott cars and Econolodge cars on the same train is an interesting idea, if that is what is meant!

Interesting to consider Amtrak as the Medicare or charity of transport.

"Today, Amtrak often operates nine car trains. The long distance passenger train of the future will probably run 15 to 20 cars. The costs of operating a train do not double when the length of the train doubles." - except when the stations enroute cannot cater for 15-20 cars in one stop, resulting in a double (or triple) stop, tying up the main line for 10-15 minutes instead of 5 with the resultant costs from doing so.

A snack car "always open" could be worthwhile. It's usually one person that handles it on a long haul journey so it's subject to his/her mealtimes, sleeping, and restroom breaks.

Some interesting ideas though.

Doesn't say anything about how to get the average Joe to know about all these features though.
 
yukon11
Member # 2997
 - posted
I think, Geoff, that if such changes were to occur, there would have to be heavy advertising.

I also believe, even now, passengers would find a 24/7 "bistro car" (with good food) to be very popular.

Richard
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us