RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Amtrak Gets DOT's Support » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
yukon11
Member # 2997
 - posted
The DOT has sided with Amtrak, not the Surface Transportation Board, regarding how to measure on time performance.

The Dept. of Transportation agrees that measuring timeliness should occur at intermediate points, along an Amtrak route, not just arrival time at the end of a route:

http://www.politico.com/tipsheets/morning-transportation/2016/04/amtrak-gets-dots-support-in-new-definition-of-on-time-performance-t-i-dems-keep-up-pressure-against-house-faa-bill- small-drone-manufacturers-start-new-lobbying-group-213531

Richard
 
PullmanCo
Member # 1138
 - posted
Well, the STB is is the regulator, so at the end of the day, its view counts.
 
yukon11
Member # 2997
 - posted
An article from Reuters, posted today:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-court-says-amtrak-too-much-power-over-152948218--finance.html

But, what does it all mean?

Richard
 
PullmanCo
Member # 1138
 - posted
Hmmm.

Well, this case went to the Supreme Court, and came back. The DC Circuit ruled, given Amtrak is a governmental entity from USSC.

It decided a regulator, who is also a competitor, violates the Takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. The District Court was reversed.

Here's the opinion, if you want to read it. The Court actually quotes Steinbeck in East of Eden.
 
PullmanCo
Member # 1138
 - posted
George Will wrote in WaPo on this.

Read it here
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us