RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Amalgam Meltdown » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
yukon11
Member # 2997
 - posted
From a 3/25 TRAINS newswire:

https://is.gd/KP3IX3

"The budget would immediately remove funding for the long-distance network — itself an arbitrarily devised amalgam of 15 routes comprised of trains traveling over 750 miles defined under 2008’s Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act."

Also:

"Travel options provided by long-distance trains on state corridors such as Chicago-Carbondale, Ill., Chicago-St. Louis, New York-Buffalo, N.Y., and Santa Barbara-Los Angeles, Cal., would disappear."

I'm not sure I get it. Does it mean that LD trains, such as the Starlight, will not operate on Amtrak corridor train track such as the Starlight over the same track as the P. Surfliners? Would the Starlight then just be San Luis Obispo to San Jose or Sacramento to Eugene?
Or, would it simply mean no train service between San Luis Obispo and San Jose or SAC to EUG, and, thus, no more Starlight?

Richard
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us