RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Study: Shreveport-Vicksburg

   
Author Topic: Study: Shreveport-Vicksburg
palmland
Full Member
Member # 4344

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for palmland     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Louisiana is apparently doing their study as part of the three state effort to initiate service from Dallas to Meridian.

You'd think the first question to be asked is - will the KCS give them access and at what cost. Might shorten the study time considerably.

I think the photo in the article was an effective way to demonstrate Amtrak as an 'essential' service.

Posts: 2397 | From: Camden, SC | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mr williams
Full Member
Member # 1928

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for mr williams     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wasn't service to Meridian proposed about a decade ago?
Posts: 395 | From: england | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
RRRICH
Full Member
Member # 1418

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for RRRICH     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mr. Williams -- indeed, this service, along with several other routes, was proposed by NARP 20+ years ago (I believe). The only proposed route which ever actually got service was Dallas-Houston, in 1988, but that service did not last long. (statement based on notes I made in a railroad atlas many years ago)
Posts: 2428 | From: Grayling, MI | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PullmanCo
Full Member
Member # 1138

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PullmanCo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
KCS was out of the passenger service before the initial window of RPSA 70. As such, it did not join Amtrak at the time.

I do not know if it a part of Amtrak now.

For service, they can, IIRC, charge what their traffic will bear. It will be a joining Amtrak for them.

GBN: Yes/No?

Posts: 1404 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
George Harris
Full Member
Member # 2077

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for George Harris     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dallas-Houston: Run time, in a word pathetic. Ridership likewise pathetic. (Maybe the second was related to the first?) I think if we could get run time down to somewhere close to driving time, there would be decent ridership, but htis is a whole nother subject.

Meridian - Vicksburg - Shreveport - Dallas / Ft. Worth:

The main problem we have here is that a good connection to the Crescent gives miserable times for point west, partucularly eastbound due to the early departure of the Crescent from New Orleans.

KCS, or more aptly KCS & NS have poured a lot of money into the ex-ICRR Meridian Shreveport line, adding signals, sidings, heavier rail, etc. It would make no sense if they DID NOT ask for quite a bit of money for additional sidings at the least. For sure there would also need to be lengthening the circuits for all road crossings, and probably adding protection to additional road crossings.

It would seem to be a good idea to have direct service frm the DFW area to the east, but what would seem to be a reasonable schedule out of the DFW area does not line up with the Crescent. Do we want another train all the way to the east?

Posts: 2808 | From: Olive Branch MS | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geoff Mayo
Full Member
Member # 153

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geoff Mayo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by George Harris:
It would make no sense if they DID NOT ask for quite a bit of money for additional sidings at the least.

It would be breaking with tradition not to milk Amtrak of whatever the host RR could get away with to benefit said RR as a whole regardless of the actual impact of an additional passenger train.

quote:
Originally posted by George Harris:
For sure there would also need to be lengthening the circuits for all road crossings, and probably adding protection to additional road crossings.

If you believe the hype, sure. If Amtrak toodle along at the prevailing speed then of course not. But would it help the RR? Sure! Go for it!
Posts: 2426 | From: Apple Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us