RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Supreme Court rules on Amtrak

   
Author Topic: Supreme Court rules on Amtrak
Mike Smith
Full Member
Member # 447

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mike Smith     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is an excellent read, especially Justice Clarence Thomas's part!

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-1080_f29g.pdf

Posts: 1418 | From: Houston, Republic of Texas | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Vincent206
Full Member
Member # 15447

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Vincent206     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't usually look to Justice Thomas' opinions for constitutional brilliance, but he at least knows how to provide comedic relief:
quote:
We have overseen and sanctioned the growth of an administrative system that concentrates the power to make laws and the power to enforce them in the hands of a vast and unaccountable administrative apparatus that finds no comfortable home in our constitutional structure. The end result may be trains that run on time (although I doubt it), but the cost is to our Constitution and the individual liberty it protects. (emphasis added)
While Justice Thomas might find an important connection between the reign of King Henry VIII and modern day Amtrak, the intention of Section 207 in the PRIIA legislation is to authorize the creation of on-time performance standards by the stakeholders most affected by the issue and administered by the relevant Federal agency. It might have been tidier if the authorizing legislation had vested only the FRA with the ultimate authority to create the standards (with input from Amtrak and the other stakeholders); but it seems clear that in the PRIIA legislation, Congress authorizes the Executive branch to create the on-time standards. Would Thomas prefer that Congress establish the on-time standards in the legislation and leave the FRA to merely enforce those standards?

I think it's time for Amtrak to evolve away from its current business model as the agency that runs the trains to an agency that administers, facilitates and oversees passenger rail transportation between the various states (which I think would be more satisfactory to Justice Thomas' viewpoint). But as we unfortunately see in the Hoosier State/Iowa Pacific situation, it appears that the current management at Amtrak will be reluctant to evolve in that direction.

Posts: 831 | From: Seattle | Registered: Jan 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mike Smith
Full Member
Member # 447

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mike Smith     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Justice Thomas is the most brilliant constitutional Justice on the Supreme Court. All you have to do is read his opinions and possess some logic, common sense, and analytical abilities.
Posts: 1418 | From: Houston, Republic of Texas | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us