RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Spring 2001 Timetable Changes » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
fubu05
Member # 465
 - posted
This is a question regarding the Spring 2001 Timetable Changes. ... What is the list of timetable changes for this one. Any of the new (Des Moines, Lake Cities/Toledo, etc) starting on the new one? What about Maricopa Amtrak Station?

------------------
Mark Landau
 

MLC
Member # 58
 - posted
Don't bet the house on AMTRAK's expansion plans!
 
MPALMER
Member # 125
 - posted
Per the latest RailPAC quarterly, Maricopa station (platform) is not open and will need to be re-constructed. It was built in a location that assumed a second track would be installed, but that track is not in place yet.
 
yummykaz
Member # 475
 - posted
I freaked out when I pulled up Sunset Ltd time schedule.Does not even show going through ElPaso from Houston! Which is where I am going in March. I called Amtrack and they said everything was the same no changes yet.

If the routes had changed, my vacation would be BLOWN!

------------------
I am in no hurry, so I take the train.
 

marp
Member # 175
 - posted
MLC is right. Norfolk Southern recently testified in Congress, "Capacity- the presence of passenger trains cannot diminsh the capacity of a line to handle its existing freight service and provide for anticipated freight growth. Compensation- NS expects to be faily compensated for use of its track and right of way. Passenger service on the heavily used mainlines is problematic, and figuring out how- if at all- passenger trains can be accommodated requires a great deal of work and analysis." H. Craig Lewis, VP Corporate Affairs before Senate Subcomommittee on Surface Transportation, Dec. 6, 2000. Trnaslation: "If you want any more trains, you're going to pay through the nose."
John DeLora
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us