RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Southeast HSR / NC-vA DOT » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
palmland
Member # 4344
 - posted
Looks like reality has set in with NC and VA acknowledging low probability of SEHSR getting off the ground. 79 mph is good enough

But, this is certainly a practical approach and one that might actually happen. I was particularly pleased with this comment: "North Carolina is working with Virginia on prospects for adding more passenger train service between Greensboro and Washington.

That is certainly the fastest way to improve transit times for daytime service between Charlotte/Greensboro and the NEC.

It is encouraging to see two states working together with minimal federal help (interference?).
 
yukon11
Member # 2997
 - posted
I agree, Mr. Palmland. A conventional train would make a lot of sense and cost much less.

I wish the same type of thinking applied to Calif. I have long thought that an extension of the Pacific Surfliner north, from San Luis Obispo to the Bay Area, would make a lot of sense. Daylight only. Especially if it would offer lounge and observatory cars along with excellent food service. Be a lot cheaper than 68 billion for HSR.

Richard
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us