RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Flag Protection

   
Author Topic: Flag Protection
yukon11
Full Member
Member # 2997

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for yukon11     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Just curious.....in the old days, whenever a train made an unscheduled stop with the danger of being overtaken by another train, there were procedures required to signal an approaching train. Under the old "rule 99", a flagman might have to place 2 torpedoes (explosive noisemakers which detonated under approaching wheels) and, when necessary, signal via a lighted fuse or red flag, to warn the oncoming train.

How do Amtrak and freight railroads do it today? Is it all by radio communication, or is some sort of flagging/lighted fuse signal also necessary?

Richard

Posts: 1909 | From: Santa Rosa | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Henry Kisor
Full Member
Member # 4776

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Henry Kisor   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey, this is a good question -- isn't there someone with operations knowledge here who can answer it?
Posts: 2236 | From: Evanston, Ill. and Ontonagon, Mich. | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rresor
Full Member
Member # 128

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for rresor     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
No more flagging, and no more torpedoes. Torpedoes passed out of general use when cabooses were discontinued a decade or more ago. Flagging was obviated by the move to radio-issued "track warrants" or "direct traffic control". Both work much the same way. The dispatcher grants exclusive occupancy of defined limits to a train (in DTC, the blocks have set boundaries, in TWC the segment is defined by mileposts). TWC does allow for following movements in the same block, but with an instruction to "look out for Train #__", with a requirement to proceed at restricted speed.

Work limits for track gangs are granted in essentially the same way. They can either be an absolute block, or have a provision that trains can contact the foreman in charge and request permission through the limits.

I'm sure anybody who is a dispatcher can amplify this and correct any misstatements I might have made. I know this stuff only from having observed it during cab rides, hi-railing, and working on the track.

Posts: 614 | From: Merchantville, NJ. USA | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geoff Mayo
Full Member
Member # 153

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geoff Mayo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Only other thing I can add is that if the train is delayed in section for a time, it should approach the next signal at reduced speed (prepared to stop?) until the aspect can be determined.

I can't find specific references to this rule so it may not apply nationally or may indeed be partially or wholy wrong.

Geoff M.

--------------------
Geoff M.

Posts: 2426 | From: Apple Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rresor
Full Member
Member # 128

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for rresor     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Geoff M.: That's the "delay in block" rule promulgated by FRA after the collision of a MARC train with Amtrak's "Capitol Ltd" in Maryland.

Rule says that, if a train comes to a stop for any reason between block signals, it must proceed at restricted speed until the aspect of the next block signal can be observed.

That's really independent of any flagging rule, though.

Posts: 614 | From: Merchantville, NJ. USA | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geoff Mayo
Full Member
Member # 153

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geoff Mayo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for that rresor; my reply was triggered by yukon11's "made an unscheduled stop" comment.

Geoff M.

--------------------
Geoff M.

Posts: 2426 | From: Apple Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us