RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » AAR v. USDOT, FRA, et al

   
Author Topic: AAR v. USDOT, FRA, et al
Gilbert B Norman
Full Member
Member # 1541

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Gilbert B Norman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Although Amtrak is not named as a defendant in this civil action, it certainly is a factor in such:

Summary

Complaint

While discussion :elsewhere" is already suggesting that this is another attempt by the railroads to "kill Amtrak", I do not hold any such thoughts (what else would you expect from me?). It would appear the underlying issue is that contracting railroads and Amtrak have existing bi-lateral agreements regarding train performance as provisions within their contractual relationships. Under PRIIA '08 (Bush era legislation; but I really think the lame duck neither knew nor cared what he was signing), the Government is attempting to abrogate the agreements by means of establishing train performance standards as law of the land.

What wins; a "nanny-state" or the sanctity of a contract?

Posts: 9979 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us