RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Fly or Drive; Why Not Rail?

   
Author Topic: Fly or Drive; Why Not Rail?
Gilbert B Norman
Full Member
Member # 1541

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Gilbert B Norman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
New York Times Business Travel columnist Joe Sharkey refers his readers to an interesting "tool" included within a "frugal living" site:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/business/drive-or-fly-a-new-book-puts-a-different-spin-on-the-question-frequent-flier.html

Brief passage:

  • There is a “fly or drive” Web tool at BeFrugal.com that helps make specific comparisons easier, even by way of providing an estimate of the environmental effect of flying versus driving on a specific trip. I found it useful, if not entirely accurate.

    After I typed in my trip itinerary details, the fly-or-drive calculator estimated that flying would cost $752.39 and that the trip would take four and a half hours each way. The cost included $229.40 for round-trip airfare, $50 for checking a bag both ways, $350 for car rental for my four-day trip, $120 for airport parking in Tucson, and a few incidentals.

    That was a bit high. My actual airfare was $275 on Southwest, which does not charge for a checked bag. At Los Angeles International Airport, my Avis rental car — which turned out to be an upgrade to a totally age-inappropriate fire engine red Mustang, was about $175, not including gas. And long-term parking at the Tucson airport is cheap, $3.99 a day in a private lot with five-minute shuttle service to the terminal. From my home in Arizona to the hotel in Long Beach, the actual trip took five hours
Here is link to the referenced tool:

http://www.befrugal.com/tools/fly-or-drive-calculator/

In the Corridor markets where Amtrak can be considered a transportation resource (sorry volks, the LD's simply are not), that tool's value would surely be enhanced if they were included.

Finally, let it be noted that Mr. Sharkey is not a "train hater", as the subject of one of his recent columns was a "trip report' of a Tampa to New York ride he took aboard the Silver Star.

Posts: 9976 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geoff Mayo
Full Member
Member # 153

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geoff Mayo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
A bit gimmicky really. The website obviously has no concept of airline schedules and pricing varies wildly. Airlines don't fly very short distances on the mainland, and not many people drive very long distances. So one can only compare middle distance - which is where most intercity rail sits. So yes, I think it could be useful if trains were included, but to be *really* useful then it needs to consider airline schedules and rail schedules - as an option for the user.

--------------------
Geoff M.

Posts: 2426 | From: Apple Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us