RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » General Forums » Open Discussion » Obama's save the children myth » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Mike Smith
Member # 447
 - posted
When obama made his gun control demands, he surrounded himself with children and echoed Biden's "if it saves one life it is worth it" myth.

Well, OK. Put your actions where your mouth is, obama. Repeal the CAFE standards for cars. We do not need an average 35 mpg fleet of cars. They will kill more people and more kids. To get to that milestone, car manufacturers MUST reduce the weight of their fleet. These lightened cars will kill more people, including children, especially when they get in the way of 18 wheelers or other delivery trucks. We do not need more mpg cars, we have plenty of oil under land we control.

Kill the CAFE standard, not our children!
 
Jerome Nicholson
Member # 3116
 - posted
Mike, I'd rather be in a crash with an 18 wheeler in a Honda Civic than a 1959 Cadillac Eldorado. Size isn't an accurate way to measure safety.
 
Mike Smith
Member # 447
 - posted
So adding some weight to the passenger cage in each vehicle would not improve the survivability of the cars, in the event of a crash? Seriously? Is that what you are attempting to state?

The CAFE standards will not allow more protective weight due to the decrease in the mpg of the vehicle.
 
George Harris
Member # 2077
 - posted
While I would not like to be in a crash with an 18 wheeler in anything less than a tank, if even that, in any sort of crash I would sure prefer to be in the 1959 Cadillac. If you compare Honda with seatbelts versus Caddy w/o seatbelts I still doubt the Honda passengers would come out better, but with each having equivalent passenger restraint, no way can I see the Honda coming out better, if you could even see it at all after the crash.

As to the gun control thing: The push is built in its entirity on emotion and warped statistics, aside from simply ignoring the constitution. It is worth noting that most of these mass shootings have occurred in areas where the shooter could be assured that there would be no one equipped to shoot back and in locations that already have gun control laws of questionable constitutionality.
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us