Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
RAILforum
»
General Forums
»
Open Discussion
»
The Election
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Gilbert B Norman: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by irishchieftain: If not for Marbury, what would the alternate method for deeming certain laws to have violated the Constitution be.[/QUOTE]Enacted legislation; the same way "bad laws" got on the books. To my kmowledge, I don't think The Fathers had in mind for the Judiciary to be empowered to overturn enacted legislation. For had that been the the case, the Constitution would have had language within Article III delineating judicial review. The Adams-Jefferson election was sort of the Trump-Joe/Hillary of its day. Incoming Jefferson wanted to discredit his predecessor by nullifying a "two bit" appointment by outgoing Adams on a technicality. There weren't too many Lower Courts back then, and I'm not lawyer enough to understand the reasoning behind the Decision, for only HS US History, college Business Law, and Mr. Google, comprise my knowledge of such. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
Home Page
Powered by
Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2
Copyright © 2007-2016
TrainWeb, Inc.
Top of Page
|
TrainWeb
|
About Us
|
Advertise With Us
|
Contact Us