Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
RAILforum
»
General Forums
»
Open Discussion
»
Please Joe
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Gilbert B Norman: [QB] Mr. Helfner, related to your immediate is that I think it is difficult to conclude otherwise that Joe is loyal to his "team", and they in turn are loyal to back to him. Look at just how stable the [URL=https://www.brookings.edu/research/tracking-turnover-in-the-biden-administration] White House staff[/URL] has been. One Chief of Staff turnover to date; one Press Secretary, one Cabinet. Now I don't know if Joe would be "down six points" if he had ditched Kamala in favor of someone who had in their CV, suggestions that he or she had qualifications to be President. There are Democrats that do have such with names like Govs. Hochul, Newsom, Pritzker, and Whitmer. However (if you can get to it), here is a [URL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevevernon/2023/04/30/most-likely-president-joe-biden-will-live-through-a-second-term/?sh=5edd5082490e] Forbes[/URL] article suggesting Joe could "make it through a second". But I'm inclined to hold the expressed thought of Republican Candidate Nikki Haley that a vote for Joe is really a vote for Kamala - and to date, the latter has not shown too much in the way of qualifications to be POTUS 47. However, on the flip side to that, how many qualifications did a certain hack politician from Kansas City show to become POTUS 33, whom the Scholars rank within their First Quartile? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
Home Page
Powered by
Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2
Copyright © 2007-2016
TrainWeb, Inc.
Top of Page
|
TrainWeb
|
About Us
|
Advertise With Us
|
Contact Us