RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » wouldn't it be cool if

   
Author Topic: wouldn't it be cool if
travelplus
Full Member
Member # 3679

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for travelplus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wouldn't it be cool if Amtrak were to switch to TGV and Talgo Trains with Nigh Trains like in Europe high speed. It would be awsome to have a tunnel between Alaska and Russia and upgrade their trains to High Speed and go all the way to Paris from San Jose CA. Or from Seattle to Paris. That would be a fun trip .

It would be fun hearing the conductor say"Ladies and Gentlemen not only are we crossing two continents in 30 miles but we are going into another day or the same day going in the other direction. It would be like the chunnel tunnel in Europe. I would have a blast taking the train from America to Europe!

Any Ideas?

Posts: 259 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Gilbert B Norman
Full Member
Member # 1541

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Gilbert B Norman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Here's one compliments of 'The Mamas and Papas":

Stars shining bright above you
Night breezes seem to whisper "I love you"
Birds singin' in the sycamore tree
Dream a little dream of me


http://www.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/paul/lyrics/mamasandpapas/dream.html

Posts: 9975 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sojourner
Full Member
Member # 3134

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for sojourner         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
In case someone needs to know, "Dream a Little Dream of Me" is a much older song than the (very fine) version by Mama Cass. Written 1931, music by Gus Kahn, lyrics by Wilbur Schwandt and Fabian Andre:

http://www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/sandman/annotations/sandman.03.shtml

Posts: 2642 | From: upstate New York | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Gilbert B Norman
Full Member
Member # 1541

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Gilbert B Norman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I believe Louis Armstrong also performed same.
Posts: 9975 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mr. Toy
Full Member
Member # 311

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mr. Toy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm thinking teleportation might be better.
Posts: 2649 | From: California's Monterey Peninsula | Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
notelvis
Full Member
Member # 3071

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for notelvis     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wouldn't it be nice?.........

--------------------
David Pressley

Advocating for passenger trains since 1973!

Climbing toward 5,000 posts like the Southwest Chief ascending Raton Pass. Cautiously, not nearly as fast as in the old days, and hoping to avoid premature reroutes.

Posts: 4203 | From: Western North Carolina | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
George Harris
Full Member
Member # 2077

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for George Harris     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This has been thought of before, and more than one study made.

The tunnel between Alaska and Siberia is the easy part. Look at a good map. there are thousands of miles of rugged country on each side of the Bering strait that are completely free of roads, railroads, any other accounterments of civilization and people in any significant number. And oh by the way, the Russian railroad system uses a different track gauge.

There was a semi-serious study done for this a few years ago. I forget the details, but if you search "interhemispheric tunnel" you might find something. The tunnel cost estimate was probably not too out of reason, but shall we say the cost given to connect it up to the rest of the world seemed somewhat optomistic, by a factor of between 5 and 10. It is doubtful that nose to tail container trains would enable the system to pay for itself. Not to mention, can you think what the response would be from the enviromentowackos if you mix "pristine arctic wilderness" and "mega-construction project"

Posts: 2808 | From: Olive Branch MS | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
vline
Full Member
Member # 1132

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for vline     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Umm, isn't the railway gauge in Russia different to the standard gauge in USA?
Mike in Australia.

Posts: 60 | From: Ballan, Victoria, Australia | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zephyr
Full Member
Member # 1651

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zephyr     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
To recap:

George Harris in exile in Taiwan (awaiting Presedential pardon?) "And oh by the way, the Russian railroad system uses a different track gauge."

Next post:

Mike in Australia (aka vline): "Umm, isn't the railway gauge in Russia different to the standard gauge in USA?"

Remark: It's kinda cute watching folks in far away places trying to communicate in English.

Posts: 445 | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JONATHON
Full Member
Member # 2899

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for JONATHON   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Wouldn't it be cool if Amtrak were to switch to TGV and Talgo Trains"

no.

--------------------
JONATHON D. ORTIZ

My MySpace

CoastStarlight@Gmail.com

Amtrak Pages WebSite

Posts: 989 | From: DIAMOND BAR CA. U.S. | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Railroad Bob
Full Member
Member # 3508

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Railroad Bob     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by zephyr:
To recap:

George Harris in exile in Taiwan (awaiting Presedential pardon?) "And oh by the way, the Russian railroad system uses a different track gauge."

No, he is really there keeping the Chinese mainlanders out, and trying to figure out why there are so many strokes in Traditional Chinese characters. Plus he does know that the Russian gauge is 5 feet vs. the world standard gauge of 4 feet 8 1/2 inches.*

*My apologies to the erudite Mr. Harris~but I couldn't resist.

Posts: 588 | From: East San Diego County, CA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
George Harris
Full Member
Member # 2077

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for George Harris     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thank you, Railroad Bob, thank you.

Maybe Vline's problem is that Australia hasn't discovered what standard gauge is. In fact presuming that "Vline" comes from the name once or is it still used by the Victoria State Railway, he lives in a state with two track gauges and next to South Australia which has all three track guages common to Australia. Or Mr. Vline, have I missed some other gauges somewhere else?

By the way, standard gauge depends upon where you are. "Standard" is more like North America, Europe, North Africa, Korea (both sides), China, Middle East (part). A lot of Africa is at 3'-6", India-Pakistan-Bangladesh-Sri Lanka has 5'-6" plus a lot at one meter (3'-3 3/8"), Southeast Asia is mostly one meter, except Japan, Taiwan, Philippines, Indonesia are 3'-6", and Russia, Finland, almost all the former Soviet Union components are 5'-0"

Ah, Railroad Bob, you are at least aware that there are two forms of Chinese writing. Many people are not. Standard Chinese used in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Simplified used in the Mainland and Singapore. Most of the Chainese based characters used in Japanese writing are standard. Generally simplified is just that: Take the standard charactere and cut out a few "extraneous" strokes, but some for no apparent reason are completely different. As people here say, they cut the heart out of love, as the character for heart is part of the standard character for love but missing from the simplified.

Standard Chinese is probably as easy or easier to learn to read than the "Simplified" used in the mainland. My local friends tell me that if you read standard Chinese, you can fumble your way through reading things written in simplified characters, but the reverse is definitely not true. I am not literate in either one, but do know enough to find the right restroom, and a lot of the directions and place names.

Boy am I ever off topic.

George

Posts: 2808 | From: Olive Branch MS | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zephyr
Full Member
Member # 1651

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zephyr     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You've all heard the saying: "There ain't such a thing as a stupid question." Well, this may disprove that old saying, but I have a question for the exiled but erudite George Harris.

What are the advantages/disadvantages of narrower gauges vs wider gauges?

And any insights why some countries went with one or the other?

Posts: 445 | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Railroad Bob
Full Member
Member # 3508

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Railroad Bob     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
And any insights why some countries went with one or the other? [/QB]
I'll let Mr. H. answer in more detail, but the classic reason for narrow gauge was it's easier to build it in tight canyons/mountains like you'll find in Colorado, and can handle sharper-radius curves. I think CO was where most of the USA 3 foot gauge was used. And the Russians liked a broad gauge so that Western trains and engines couldn't be set on their tracks and vice versa.

Right Mr. H., I knew about those points you made about written Chinese. Always good to know the woman/man characters for the "WCs" and other everyday characters. Now that I've steered the thread into the fine points of Chinese, maybe Mr. Slotkin can come up with another trainku to bring us back... [Razz]

Posts: 588 | From: East San Diego County, CA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ira Slotkin
Full Member
Member # 81

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ira Slotkin     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Careful what you ask for Bob...

I like narrow gauge:
walking on our separate rails
easy to hold hands

puffing mountain goat
clings to narrow canyon wall
narrow gauge but tough

Ira

Posts: 300 | From: Denver, CO USA | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Railroad Bob
Full Member
Member # 3508

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Railroad Bob     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mr. Slotkin: Thank you for raising the "gauge" of our discourse here... [Smile]
Posts: 588 | From: East San Diego County, CA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us